Saturday, February 28, 2009
Man On A Wire
I saw this ad on the back of the Report On Business magazine and thought it was interesting. Unfortunately, this is as big as the blog would let me make the image. I think it's a good ad but found that once I read the tag line I was distracted by looking for the guy on the high wire and didn't bother to read the body copy.
I think there might be a more effective way to do this ad, but I'm wondering what other people think. Is this a great way to draw people's attention or have the copywriters outsmarted themselves?
Thursday, February 26, 2009
The Ogilvy Lizard
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Bud Light
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJJL5dxgVaM
I feel kind of stupid posting an ad from back in 2007 but I think this is a great example of viral marketing.
This ad for Bud Tv was part of a viral marketing campaign back in Spring 2007.
Anyway, the reason I am posting this ad is that now, two years after this video first appeared on the Internet, it's still being passed around by people. My brother just recently emailed me this after he received it from a friend of his.
Even thoguh Bud Tv is no longer around this video is still effective ad for Bud Light. But more than anything, I just think it's funny and obviously so do a lot of other people if it's still being viewed online and emailed to friends.
I feel kind of stupid posting an ad from back in 2007 but I think this is a great example of viral marketing.
This ad for Bud Tv was part of a viral marketing campaign back in Spring 2007.
Anyway, the reason I am posting this ad is that now, two years after this video first appeared on the Internet, it's still being passed around by people. My brother just recently emailed me this after he received it from a friend of his.
Even thoguh Bud Tv is no longer around this video is still effective ad for Bud Light. But more than anything, I just think it's funny and obviously so do a lot of other people if it's still being viewed online and emailed to friends.
Monday, February 23, 2009
Ziploc
I found these Ziploc billboards in the magazine Applied Arts a while back. They were created by a student from the Miami Ad School. I think they make really good use of the billboards' physical surroundings and, like the McDonald's billboard Braden posted earlier, get the point across very nicely. While the greenery behind the billboard turns yellow and brown, the Ziploc bag keeps what's 'inside' it fresh.
New Coke- Take 2
Tropicana just rolled out new packaging in conjunction with a new campaign for their flagship juice line in January.
It has already been recalled by Tropicana due to public demand and will revert to the previous style of packaging by early March.
Excerpt from the NY Times article:
The about-face comes after consumers complained about the makeover in letters, e-mail messages and telephone calls and clamored for a return of the original look.
Some of those commenting described the new packaging as “ugly” or “stupid,” and resembling “a generic bargain brand” or a “store brand.”
“Do any of these package-design people actually shop for orange juice?” the writer of one e-mail message asked rhetorically. “Because I do, and the new cartons stink.”
Others described the redesign as making it more difficult to distinguish among the varieties of Tropicana or differentiate Tropicana from other orange juices.
Though this isn't as catastrophic as New Coke was it's still an example of how focus group testing can be misleading for a company. Tropicana stated they just didn't realize how strongly their most loyal customers felt about the brand's packaging because it didn't come out in their research... Oops. Maybe they should have done research among their most loyal customers rather than a bunch of random people who may or may not even buy Tropicana. As a Tropicana lover myself, I most agree with the comment about the new packaging looking like a generic bargain brand. It probably wouldn't make me stop buying it, but I sure wouldn't want to look at it for long.
It has already been recalled by Tropicana due to public demand and will revert to the previous style of packaging by early March.
Excerpt from the NY Times article:
The about-face comes after consumers complained about the makeover in letters, e-mail messages and telephone calls and clamored for a return of the original look.
Some of those commenting described the new packaging as “ugly” or “stupid,” and resembling “a generic bargain brand” or a “store brand.”
“Do any of these package-design people actually shop for orange juice?” the writer of one e-mail message asked rhetorically. “Because I do, and the new cartons stink.”
Others described the redesign as making it more difficult to distinguish among the varieties of Tropicana or differentiate Tropicana from other orange juices.
Though this isn't as catastrophic as New Coke was it's still an example of how focus group testing can be misleading for a company. Tropicana stated they just didn't realize how strongly their most loyal customers felt about the brand's packaging because it didn't come out in their research... Oops. Maybe they should have done research among their most loyal customers rather than a bunch of random people who may or may not even buy Tropicana. As a Tropicana lover myself, I most agree with the comment about the new packaging looking like a generic bargain brand. It probably wouldn't make me stop buying it, but I sure wouldn't want to look at it for long.
McDonald's Does it Again
How the big dogs stay on top. In case you can't tell, they planted seeds on a brown billboard and let them grow into the letters, so that they were spelled with lettuce (or at least a leafy plant). Illustrates the point nicely, doesn't it?
Sunday, February 22, 2009
New and Exciting Bus Ads in Winnipeg!
This is regarding to a comment Wade made a few months back about there being no exciting bus ads in Winnipeg. Unfortunately I was unable to snatch a picture, but on my way home from the Exchange I saw a bus that had two cars that had collided on the side of it with the front and rear wheels of the two cars lining up with the wheels of the bus. It was for an auto body shop...can't remember which one now...I recognized the ad as well know. I just thought it was pretty interesting. Keep your eyes out for it!
Saturday, February 21, 2009
Sumo!
This commercial makes me laugh a year after it's release. I just thought you should all see it.
Friday, February 20, 2009
The Atheist Bus Ad Controversy
It was recently reported that Ottawa is the latest Canadian city to refuse to run these bus ads. The Canadian list now includes: Vancouver, Victoria, Halifax, Kelowna, Ottawa, and London. Only Toronto and Calgary are willing to run them, with Toronto currently running them on buses, street cars, and subway interiors. Calgary will be running them on buses in the near future.
The issue of whether or not to run these ads is a controversial one. There's the issue of free speech. Then, is it worth pissing off the majority to satisfy a fringe minority group? Then there's the whole separation of church and state issue that could be brought up. This issue seems fraught with drama, any thoughts?
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Underneath it all.
Boston PIzza Survey
So, I was at BP the other night for dinner with a friend and we received the worst service ever. So, when our waitress provided us with a survey opportunity (one of those things you get at the bottom of your receipt sometimes) I jumped at the chance to attempt to win $1000 bucks in exchange for my disappointment.
One of the questions on the survey was whether or not I could remember any recent BP advertising, what it was, and whether or not I liked it. I could remember that super annoying TV ad that they ran recently to promote the 5 pizzas/5 pastas for $10 bucks with the family with the black-rimmed glasses. You know the one. I described the ad, told them how much I hated it, then told them how effective it was!
Despite my displeasure with it, I obviously remembered the ad, the restaurant it was for, and the promotion. It succeeded at its purpose. Damn, I hate it when crappy ads work... what am I getting myself into?
Here's hoping I win the $1000... cross your fingers for me!
One of the questions on the survey was whether or not I could remember any recent BP advertising, what it was, and whether or not I liked it. I could remember that super annoying TV ad that they ran recently to promote the 5 pizzas/5 pastas for $10 bucks with the family with the black-rimmed glasses. You know the one. I described the ad, told them how much I hated it, then told them how effective it was!
Despite my displeasure with it, I obviously remembered the ad, the restaurant it was for, and the promotion. It succeeded at its purpose. Damn, I hate it when crappy ads work... what am I getting myself into?
Here's hoping I win the $1000... cross your fingers for me!
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Sunday, February 15, 2009
The Snuggie Pub Crawl
You know that ridiculous blanket with sleeves, the one with those terrible infomercials? You know - buy one for only $19.99 and if you buy one, you get one free and they'll even throw in a portable reading light. Come on, we have all made fun of them before.
Well now instead of being completely embarrassed by your stupid looking blanket, you can wear your Snuggie proudly as you party in the streets of downtown Chicago.
http://www.snuggiepubcrawl.com/
On April 18, 2009, over a thousand people all dressed in their Snuggies will participate in the first ever Snuggie Pub Crawl. The only requirement to take part in this pub crawl is you have to wear a Snuggie.
The organizers of this event are two guys in their twenties who have full-time Internet marketing jobs. They have nothing to do with the Snuggie product.
I am totally fascinated by this event. I think this is a great way to generate buzz around a product that initially was mocked because of how stupid you would actually look wearing it. Also, it means a boost in sales as everyone who wants to go on the pub crawl has to buy their own Snuggie beforehand.
And I’m not going to lie, I’m totally bummed out that we are in Chicago just a week earlier and we’re missing this!
Well now instead of being completely embarrassed by your stupid looking blanket, you can wear your Snuggie proudly as you party in the streets of downtown Chicago.
http://www.snuggiepubcrawl.com/
On April 18, 2009, over a thousand people all dressed in their Snuggies will participate in the first ever Snuggie Pub Crawl. The only requirement to take part in this pub crawl is you have to wear a Snuggie.
The organizers of this event are two guys in their twenties who have full-time Internet marketing jobs. They have nothing to do with the Snuggie product.
I am totally fascinated by this event. I think this is a great way to generate buzz around a product that initially was mocked because of how stupid you would actually look wearing it. Also, it means a boost in sales as everyone who wants to go on the pub crawl has to buy their own Snuggie beforehand.
And I’m not going to lie, I’m totally bummed out that we are in Chicago just a week earlier and we’re missing this!
Saturday, February 14, 2009
A Birth Control Pill That Promised Too Much
Interesting... especially considering some of our presentations last semester...
from:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/business/11pill.html?_r=2&partner=rss
A Birth Control Pill That Promised Too Much
By NATASHA SINGER
Published: February 10, 2009
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals has just introduced a new $20 million advertising campaign for Yaz, the most popular birth control pill in the United States.
But the television ads, now running during prime-time shows like “Grey’s Anatomy” and on cable networks, are not typical spots promoting the benefits of a prescription drug. Instead, they warn that nobody should take Yaz hoping that it will also cure pimples or premenstrual syndrome.
As part of an unusual crackdown on deceptive consumer drug advertising, the Food and Drug Administration and the attorneys general of 27 states have required Bayer to run these new ads to correct previous Yaz marketing.
Regulators say the ads overstated the drug’s ability to improve women’s moods and clear up acne, while playing down its potential health risks. Under a settlement with the states, Bayer agreed last Friday to spend at least $20 million on the campaign and for the next six years to submit all Yaz ads for federal screening before they appear.
“You may have seen some Yaz commercials recently that were not clear,” an actress says in the new corrective television spot, as she looks into the camera. “The F.D.A. wants us to correct a few points in those ads.”
Yaz is the best-selling oral contraception pill in the United States, with sales last year of about $616 million or about 18 percent market share, according to IMS Health, a health care information company.
Critics of consumer drug advertising say that while the F.D.A. sends a few dozen letters each year asking drug companies to suspend, amend or correct informational pamphlets and videos, it is unusual for the government to require commercials to set the record straight.
“They rarely require these corrective campaigns,” said Judy Norsigian, the executive director of Our Bodies Ourselves, a health education and women’s advocacy group in Cambridge, Mass. But she said the popularity of the Yaz brand and the misleading ads had demanded a rare punishment. “These ads should never have been out there,” Ms. Norsigian said.
Representatives of the F.D.A., and the Florida attorney general, who led the states’ effort, declined requests for phone interviews. They released a joint statement on Monday in which they said, in part, they wanted to “clean up misleading advertising in the marketplace.”
California, Texas, Massachusetts and Michigan were among other states in the settlement, in which Bayer did not admit that it had engaged in deceptive advertising or committed any wrongdoing.
A Bayer spokeswoman responded to a query with an e-mail message. “The ad for Yaz was revised to more clearly state the indications for Yaz,” she wrote, adding that no one from Bayer was available for a phone interview to answer other questions on Tuesday.
The corrective television commercials, which began appearing two weeks ago, are scheduled to run until July 26. New print ads, in national magazines like Lucky and Elle, give detailed information about Yaz, but do not indicate they are meant to correct earlier television ads.
The F.D.A. first moved against the Yaz campaign last October, with a warning letter to Bayer saying that two television ads overstated the drug’s benefits while understating its risks. By giving consumers the impression that Yaz was generally a drug for acne and general mood problems, the company’s ads ran afoul of federal laws against promoting the unapproved uses of a drug, the F.D.A. said. The agency approved Yaz in 2006 as a birth control pill that has a side benefit in treating mood-related psychological problems called premenstrual dysphoric disorder.
In 2007, the agency approved another side benefit of Yaz, that of improving moderate acne. But Yaz contains drospirenone, a progestin that can cause excess potassium production in some patients, its side effects include an increased risk of serious heart and other health problems.
After the F.D.A. complained, Bayer halted the Yaz ads. The agency told Bayer to submit a media plan for a corrective message that would reach the same size and kind of television audiences as the misleading ads did.....
LOTS MORE ARTICLE TO READ AT THE SITE - GO TO: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/business/11pill.html?_r=2&partner=rss
....Bruce L. Lambert, a professor of pharmacy administration at the University of Illinois at Chicago, lauded the F.D.A. for insisting this time that Bayer run a corrective advertising campaign. But he referred to the corrective $20 million ad campaign for Yaz as “chump change” and “just the cost of doing business.”
“I don’t think it is likely to stop,” he said, “unless there are more significant consequences.”
from:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/business/11pill.html?_r=2&partner=rss
A Birth Control Pill That Promised Too Much
By NATASHA SINGER
Published: February 10, 2009
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals has just introduced a new $20 million advertising campaign for Yaz, the most popular birth control pill in the United States.
But the television ads, now running during prime-time shows like “Grey’s Anatomy” and on cable networks, are not typical spots promoting the benefits of a prescription drug. Instead, they warn that nobody should take Yaz hoping that it will also cure pimples or premenstrual syndrome.
As part of an unusual crackdown on deceptive consumer drug advertising, the Food and Drug Administration and the attorneys general of 27 states have required Bayer to run these new ads to correct previous Yaz marketing.
Regulators say the ads overstated the drug’s ability to improve women’s moods and clear up acne, while playing down its potential health risks. Under a settlement with the states, Bayer agreed last Friday to spend at least $20 million on the campaign and for the next six years to submit all Yaz ads for federal screening before they appear.
“You may have seen some Yaz commercials recently that were not clear,” an actress says in the new corrective television spot, as she looks into the camera. “The F.D.A. wants us to correct a few points in those ads.”
Yaz is the best-selling oral contraception pill in the United States, with sales last year of about $616 million or about 18 percent market share, according to IMS Health, a health care information company.
Critics of consumer drug advertising say that while the F.D.A. sends a few dozen letters each year asking drug companies to suspend, amend or correct informational pamphlets and videos, it is unusual for the government to require commercials to set the record straight.
“They rarely require these corrective campaigns,” said Judy Norsigian, the executive director of Our Bodies Ourselves, a health education and women’s advocacy group in Cambridge, Mass. But she said the popularity of the Yaz brand and the misleading ads had demanded a rare punishment. “These ads should never have been out there,” Ms. Norsigian said.
Representatives of the F.D.A., and the Florida attorney general, who led the states’ effort, declined requests for phone interviews. They released a joint statement on Monday in which they said, in part, they wanted to “clean up misleading advertising in the marketplace.”
California, Texas, Massachusetts and Michigan were among other states in the settlement, in which Bayer did not admit that it had engaged in deceptive advertising or committed any wrongdoing.
A Bayer spokeswoman responded to a query with an e-mail message. “The ad for Yaz was revised to more clearly state the indications for Yaz,” she wrote, adding that no one from Bayer was available for a phone interview to answer other questions on Tuesday.
The corrective television commercials, which began appearing two weeks ago, are scheduled to run until July 26. New print ads, in national magazines like Lucky and Elle, give detailed information about Yaz, but do not indicate they are meant to correct earlier television ads.
The F.D.A. first moved against the Yaz campaign last October, with a warning letter to Bayer saying that two television ads overstated the drug’s benefits while understating its risks. By giving consumers the impression that Yaz was generally a drug for acne and general mood problems, the company’s ads ran afoul of federal laws against promoting the unapproved uses of a drug, the F.D.A. said. The agency approved Yaz in 2006 as a birth control pill that has a side benefit in treating mood-related psychological problems called premenstrual dysphoric disorder.
In 2007, the agency approved another side benefit of Yaz, that of improving moderate acne. But Yaz contains drospirenone, a progestin that can cause excess potassium production in some patients, its side effects include an increased risk of serious heart and other health problems.
After the F.D.A. complained, Bayer halted the Yaz ads. The agency told Bayer to submit a media plan for a corrective message that would reach the same size and kind of television audiences as the misleading ads did.....
LOTS MORE ARTICLE TO READ AT THE SITE - GO TO: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/business/11pill.html?_r=2&partner=rss
....Bruce L. Lambert, a professor of pharmacy administration at the University of Illinois at Chicago, lauded the F.D.A. for insisting this time that Bayer run a corrective advertising campaign. But he referred to the corrective $20 million ad campaign for Yaz as “chump change” and “just the cost of doing business.”
“I don’t think it is likely to stop,” he said, “unless there are more significant consequences.”
Friday, February 13, 2009
FOX"s "Remote-Free TV" Experiment
Not sure if everyone has heard of this experiment that FOX has been trying out this season with the show Fringe and has now extended to their new show Dollhouse.
In an effort to deliver better results to advertisers they are only running 10 minutes of commercials during these shows (vs. 16 minutes for most TV shows)and are making the commercial blocks smaller in hopes of keeping people in their seats. FOX is charging a 40-50% premium for these spots and according to Nielsen, brand recall was 22% higher for Fringe than for other primetime dramas.
Historically the first and last commercials of a block are the most often seen, so if there's only 2 spots in a block it will result in more people actually seeing it because they'll just stay in front of the TV.
"Regardless of whether the format returns next season, Fox executives say the experiments with the number of commercials shown in its programs will continue."
Is this a sign of things to come for TV or is this just an example of desperate times, desperate measures?
In an effort to deliver better results to advertisers they are only running 10 minutes of commercials during these shows (vs. 16 minutes for most TV shows)and are making the commercial blocks smaller in hopes of keeping people in their seats. FOX is charging a 40-50% premium for these spots and according to Nielsen, brand recall was 22% higher for Fringe than for other primetime dramas.
Historically the first and last commercials of a block are the most often seen, so if there's only 2 spots in a block it will result in more people actually seeing it because they'll just stay in front of the TV.
"Regardless of whether the format returns next season, Fox executives say the experiments with the number of commercials shown in its programs will continue."
Is this a sign of things to come for TV or is this just an example of desperate times, desperate measures?
Thursday, February 12, 2009
YouTube ads
I watch a lot of YouTube. Who doesn't? One thing I have noticed is that they are getting very clever at placing ads. Companies can pay to have their message posted on top of related videos or videos most popular amongst a target audience. It comes as either a pop up of text at the bottom of the screen or even little bubbles that don't have that useful little X that you can use to close it. Now it's gotten to the point where real ads with colour and pictures are being displayed on the more popular videos. It makes me sick... well... just because I didn't think of it first.
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Talk about product placement...
iPhone yaaaaay
With this wonderful piece of technology, I am now able to upload pictures from my phone directly to the web!
Expect pictures concerning advertising from around our wonderful city.
Expect pictures concerning advertising from around our wonderful city.
Monday, February 9, 2009
Friday, February 6, 2009
Facebook as Market Researcher
Facebook may have finally found a way to make some money for its owners. They are planning to distribute corporate opinion polls to select members, beginning this spring. This could be a great opportunity for both Facebook and for corporate clients looking for input. If successful, these surveys could be a great alternative to focus groups for businesses to utilize.
We'll see how well they go over though. So far Facebook hasn't been able to deliver results for advertisers. The Golden Goose has yet to start laying eggs.
We'll see how well they go over though. So far Facebook hasn't been able to deliver results for advertisers. The Golden Goose has yet to start laying eggs.
Coming Soon to a theatre near you:
Commercials have become an accepted part of the movie-going experience. Now a new study will help cement their presence in darkened auditoriums everywhere.
Research by Integrated Media Measurement suggests that cinema ads, when combined with TV ads, more than double the effectiveness of TV ads alone. (Thanks, guys.) Tracking the results of three ad campaigns for cable TV shows, researchers found that only 10.1 per cent of subjects exposed to a TV-only campaign watched the show's premiere, compared with 22.7 per cent for combined TV and cinema campaigns, according to MediaPost.com.
Published by the Globe and Mail Friday February 6, 2009
I guess this news means that we'll probably be seeing even more ads at the movies in the future. Lucky us!
Research by Integrated Media Measurement suggests that cinema ads, when combined with TV ads, more than double the effectiveness of TV ads alone. (Thanks, guys.) Tracking the results of three ad campaigns for cable TV shows, researchers found that only 10.1 per cent of subjects exposed to a TV-only campaign watched the show's premiere, compared with 22.7 per cent for combined TV and cinema campaigns, according to MediaPost.com.
Published by the Globe and Mail Friday February 6, 2009
I guess this news means that we'll probably be seeing even more ads at the movies in the future. Lucky us!
Thursday, February 5, 2009
POWERTHIRST!
Sorry, the intensity of these ads deserved an all caps title. I for one love parody ads and these ones almost made me pee a little I laughed so hard. Maybe it's because I used to date a UFC fanatic so I have seen a lot of "real" ads like these... anyway, I just wanted to share the hilarity that is POWERTHIRST. P.S. A Dave Shorr look alike makes an appearance...
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Peer Into A Soul
I'm not sure if any of you have seen those new commercials with the creepy guy in the mask that walks up and starts staring into the camera. The only thing that comes up at the end of the commercial is the website www.peerintoasoul.ca
It's a weird commercial and because I had absolutely no idea what it was for I went to the website. Turns out it's actually for the new car by Kia.
I think this was a fair good example of a teaser campaign. The ads are just odd enough to pique your interest and get you to visit the website where you get to see the rest of the ad and learn that it's actually for a car.
I still don't understand why the guy in the first ad has the clear creepy mask over his face but I don't that really matters. What matters is this ad got me to check out the website.
It's a weird commercial and because I had absolutely no idea what it was for I went to the website. Turns out it's actually for the new car by Kia.
I think this was a fair good example of a teaser campaign. The ads are just odd enough to pique your interest and get you to visit the website where you get to see the rest of the ad and learn that it's actually for a car.
I still don't understand why the guy in the first ad has the clear creepy mask over his face but I don't that really matters. What matters is this ad got me to check out the website.
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Self-Deprecation
These new ads remind me a lot of the old "We're Number Two" Avis car rental ads. I've noticed that self-deprecation ads have been making a comeback.
I have no idea if anyone knows if this has been working or if it has a history of effectiveness. Any thoughts?
I have no idea if anyone knows if this has been working or if it has a history of effectiveness. Any thoughts?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)